deli restaurant: be used to hungry person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to hungry person 1.00
be used to eat in 0.77
be used to eat at 0.76
be used to eat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deli restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deli restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(deli restaurant, be used to eat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(deli restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(deli restaurant, be used to eat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(deli restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(deli restaurant, be used to eat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deli restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(deli restaurant, be used to eat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deli restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(deli restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(deli restaurant, be used to eat at)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(deli restaurant, be used to hungry person)