deli: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.72
, store
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.39
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.38
, grocery store
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good for 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(deli, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(deli, is good for)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(deli, is good for)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(deli, is good for)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deli, is good for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deli, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(deli, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)