deli: is salami good for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.72
, store
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.39
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.38
, grocery store
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is salami good for 1.00
is salami good 1.00
is salami 0.98
is meat 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(deli, is salami good for)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(deli, is salami)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(deli, is salami)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(deli, is salami)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(deli, is salami good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(deli, is salami good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(deli, is meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(deli, is salami)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(deli, is salami good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(deli, is meat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(deli, is salami good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(deli, is meat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(deli, is meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deli, is salami good for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deli, is salami good for)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(deli, is salami good for)