dell: be great place work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents laptop
Weight: 0.62
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, brand
Weight: 0.59
, vendor
Weight: 0.58
, corporation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thinkpad
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.34
, ibm
Weight: 0.34
, sony
Weight: 0.34
, toshiba
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be great place work 1.00
has quality good 0.76
is best 0.76
take long do 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(laptop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dell, be great place work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dell, be great place work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(laptop, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(laptop, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(thinkpad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(laptop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(dell, be great place work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(dell, be great place work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(toshiba, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(toshiba, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(thinkpad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(thinkpad, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dell, be great place work)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(dell, take long do)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dell, take long do)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dell, take long do)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dell, take long do)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dell, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(dell, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dell, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dell, is best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dell, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dell, is best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dell, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dell, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dell, be great place work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(laptop, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toshiba, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thinkpad, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dell, be great place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(laptop, has quality good)