demand: affect recruitment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect recruitment 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, affect recruitment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect recruitment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(demand, affect recruitment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(supply, affect recruitment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(supply, affect recruitment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(demand, affect recruitment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(demand, affect recruitment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(demand, affect recruitment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(demand, affect recruitment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, affect recruitment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(demand, affect recruitment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(demand, affect recruitment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, affect recruitment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(supply, affect recruitment)