demand: be greater than marginal revenue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be greater than marginal revenue 1.00
be greater than revenue 0.94
be above marginal revenue 0.93
be equal to marginal cost 0.87
be equal to revenue 0.86
is marginal cost 0.86
be equal to average revenue 0.86
be equal to marginal benefit 0.86
is average revenue 0.86
be above revenue 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(supply, is marginal cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(supply, is marginal cost)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(supply, is marginal cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(demand, be above marginal revenue)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(demand, be above marginal revenue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(demand, be equal to marginal benefit)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(demand, be equal to marginal benefit)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(demand, be equal to average revenue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(demand, be equal to average revenue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(demand, be equal to marginal benefit)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(demand, be above marginal revenue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(demand, be above marginal revenue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(demand, be equal to average revenue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(demand, be equal to marginal benefit)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(demand, be equal to average revenue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(demand, be greater than marginal revenue)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(supply, is marginal cost)