demand: is downward sloping

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is downward sloping 1.00
is upward sloping 0.97
is downward sloping curve 0.97
is downward sloping 3 reasons 0.94
is downward slope 0.92
is sloping 0.90
is downward 0.90
is sloping curve 0.89
is sloped 0.84
is positively sloped 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(supply, is upward sloping)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(supply, is positively sloped)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(supply, is upward sloping)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(supply, is upward sloping)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(supply, is positively sloped)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(supply, is positively sloped)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(demand, is downward sloping)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, is downward slope)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(demand, is downward slope)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(demand, is downward slope)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(demand, is downward slope)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(demand, is downward sloping)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(demand, is downward sloping)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(supply, is upward sloping)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(demand, is downward sloping)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(supply, is positively sloped)