demand: is elastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is elastic 1.00
be elastic 1.00
is more elastic 0.98
be elastic in run 0.95
be more elastic in run 0.93
be elastic in long run 0.93
be more elastic in long run 0.92
be perfectly elastic 0.90
becomes elastic demand 0.88
be elastic in segment 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(supply, is elastic)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(supply, be elastic in run)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(supply, is more elastic)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(supply, be more elastic in run)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(supply, be elastic in long run)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(supply, be more elastic in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(supply, be more elastic in long run)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(supply, be elastic in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(supply, be elastic in long run)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(supply, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(supply, is elastic)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(supply, is more elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(supply, is more elastic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(supply, be more elastic in run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(supply, be more elastic in run)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(demand, is elastic)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(demand, be more elastic in long run)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(demand, be more elastic in long run)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(demand, be more elastic in long run)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(demand, be more elastic in long run)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(demand, is elastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(supply, is elastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(supply, is more elastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(supply, be more elastic in run)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(supply, be elastic in run)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(demand, is elastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(supply, be more elastic in long run)
...