demand: is management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is management 1.00
be good management 0.95
is chain management 0.85
have chain management 0.84
have important chain management 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(supply, is chain management)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(supply, be good management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(supply, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(supply, be good management)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(supply, is chain management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(supply, is chain management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(demand, is management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(demand, is management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(demand, is management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(supply, be good management)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(demand, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(supply, is chain management)