demos: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.41
Siblings functional group
Weight: 0.31
, sonic youth
Weight: 0.30
, audience
Weight: 0.30
, tlc
Weight: 0.30
, teens
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
is low quality 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(demos, is quality)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(demos, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(demos, is quality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(demos, is low quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(demos, is quality)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(demos, is low quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(demos, is quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(demos, is low quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(demos, is quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(demos, is low quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(demos, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(demos, is quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(demos, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(demos, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(demos, is quality)