denial: be rated pg 13

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense mechanism
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.63
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rejection
Weight: 0.34
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.32
, injustice
Weight: 0.32
, immune system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated pg 13 1.00
is 2 rated t 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(denial, be rated pg 13) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(injustice, is 2 rated t)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(denial, be rated pg 13) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(injustice, is 2 rated t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(injustice, is 2 rated t)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(denial, be rated pg 13) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(denial, be rated pg 13)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(denial, be rated pg 13) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(denial, be rated pg 13) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(denial, be rated pg 13)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(denial, be rated pg 13) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(denial, be rated pg 13)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(denial, be rated pg 13) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(injustice, is 2 rated t)