denial: is film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense mechanism
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.63
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rejection
Weight: 0.34
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.32
, injustice
Weight: 0.32
, immune system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is film 1.00
be in film 0.99
is theatrical subject 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(issue, be in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(denial, is film)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(issue, be in film)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in film)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hypocrisy, is theatrical subject)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(issue, be in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, is film)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hypocrisy, is theatrical subject) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(hypocrisy, is theatrical subject)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(denial, is film)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(denial, is film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(denial, is film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(issue, be in film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hypocrisy, is theatrical subject)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(denial, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(issue, be in film)