denim: be at department store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, trend
Weight: 0.57
Siblings silk
Weight: 0.35
, wool
Weight: 0.35
, polyester
Weight: 0.35
, tweed
Weight: 0.35
, lace
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at department store 1.00
be at store 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fabric, be at store)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(denim, be at department store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(denim, be at department store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fabric, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be at store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fabric, be at store)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(denim, be at department store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(denim, be at department store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(denim, be at department store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(denim, be at department store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(denim, be at department store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fabric, be at store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fabric, be at store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(denim, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)