denmark: have low birth rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.62
, democracy
Weight: 0.59
, new zealand
Weight: 0.57
, nation
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings netherlands
Weight: 0.56
, germany
Weight: 0.37
, switzerland
Weight: 0.35
, sweden
Weight: 0.35
, australia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low birth rate 1.00
have birth rate 0.96
have rate 0.86
have higher death rate 0.85
have low crime rate 0.84
have death rate 0.83
have highest rate 0.83
have low unemployment rates 0.81
have high cancer rate 0.81
have highest cancer rate 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sweden, have low birth rate)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, have low crime rate)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(netherlands, have low crime rate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sweden, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sweden, have low birth rate)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(switzerland, have low crime rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(switzerland, have low crime rate)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(netherlands, have low crime rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(netherlands, have low crime rate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(denmark, have low birth rate)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(denmark, have low crime rate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(denmark, have low crime rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have low crime rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(denmark, have low crime rate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(denmark, have high cancer rate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(denmark, have highest cancer rate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have highest cancer rate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(denmark, have high cancer rate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have high cancer rate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(denmark, have highest cancer rate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(denmark, have high cancer rate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(denmark, have highest cancer rate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(denmark, have low birth rate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sweden, have low birth rate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(switzerland, have low crime rate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(denmark, have low birth rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(netherlands, have low crime rate)