denmark: is developed country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.62
, democracy
Weight: 0.59
, new zealand
Weight: 0.57
, nation
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings netherlands
Weight: 0.56
, germany
Weight: 0.37
, switzerland
Weight: 0.35
, sweden
Weight: 0.35
, australia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed country 1.00
is country 0.81
be considered country 0.80
is rich country 0.78
be considered scandinavian country 0.76
was established 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(denmark, is developed country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(netherlands, is developed country)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sweden, is developed country)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is developed country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(australia, is developed country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(germany, is developed country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(netherlands, is rich country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sweden, is rich country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(netherlands, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(sweden, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(australia, be considered country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(denmark, is developed country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(netherlands, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(netherlands, is developed country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(germany, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(germany, is developed country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(switzerland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is developed country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(australia, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(australia, is developed country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(australia, is country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(germany, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(germany, is country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(netherlands, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(netherlands, is country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(switzerland, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(sweden, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sweden, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sweden, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sweden, is developed country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(australia, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(australia, be considered country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(netherlands, is rich country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(netherlands, is rich country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sweden, is rich country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sweden, is rich country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(denmark, is developed country)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(denmark, is country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(denmark, is rich country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(denmark, is rich country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is rich country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(denmark, is rich country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(denmark, is country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(denmark, be considered scandinavian country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(denmark, be considered scandinavian country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(denmark, be considered scandinavian country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(denmark, was established)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(denmark, is country)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(denmark, was established)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(denmark, be considered scandinavian country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(denmark, was established)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(denmark, was established)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(denmark, is developed country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new zealand, is country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(netherlands, is developed country)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(switzerland, is developed country)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(germany, is developed country)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sweden, is developed country)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(australia, is developed country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(netherlands, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(switzerland, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(sweden, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(germany, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(australia, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(netherlands, is rich country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sweden, is rich country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(australia, be considered country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(denmark, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new zealand, is country)