dentist: be called dentists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.58
, expert
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dental office
Weight: 0.62
, surgeon
Weight: 0.36
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.36
, obstetrician
Weight: 0.35
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called dentists 1.00
working for dentists 0.96
is doctors 0.81
be considered doctors 0.78
make more than doctors 0.76
be different from doctors 0.76
be paid more than doctors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, is doctors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pharmacist, is doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, is doctors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(dentist, be called dentists)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be paid more than doctors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(dentist, make more than doctors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(dentist, make more than doctors)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(dentist, be paid more than doctors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(dentist, make more than doctors)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dentist, be paid more than doctors)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(dentist, make more than doctors)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dentist, be paid more than doctors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be called dentists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dentist, be called dentists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be called dentists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pharmacist, is doctors)