deodorant: be for underarms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents perfume
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.62
, substance
Weight: 0.59
Siblings lotion
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.36
, shampoo
Weight: 0.36
, suntan lotion
Weight: 0.35
, disposable razor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for underarms 1.00
be for underarms use 0.99
be for armpits 0.83
apply to armpits 0.82
be bad for skin 0.77
burn skin 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lotion, burn skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(lotion, burn skin)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(lotion, burn skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(deodorant, be for underarms)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms use)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be for armpits)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(deodorant, be for armpits)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be for armpits)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(deodorant, burn skin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(deodorant, apply to armpits)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(deodorant, burn skin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(deodorant, be for underarms use)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(deodorant, be for underarms use)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, burn skin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for skin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(deodorant, apply to armpits)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms use)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(deodorant, be for armpits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deodorant, burn skin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(deodorant, apply to armpits)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(deodorant, be bad for skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be bad for skin)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deodorant, be bad for skin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, apply to armpits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(deodorant, be for underarms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be for underarms)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lotion, burn skin)