:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lotion, burn)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, burn)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lotion, burn skin)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lotion, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lotion, burn)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(deodorant, burn)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(deodorant, burn)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lotion, burn)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mouthwash, burn)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lotion, burn skin)