department: need work together

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police department
Weight: 0.91
, fire department
Weight: 0.68
, staff
Weight: 0.66
, unit
Weight: 0.64
Siblings police
Weight: 0.69
, post office
Weight: 0.68
, committee
Weight: 0.66
, education
Weight: 0.65
, agriculture
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
need work together 1.00
need work 0.89
is needed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(education, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(education, is needed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(education, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(department, need work together)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(department, need work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(department, need work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(department, is needed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(department, is needed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(department, need work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(department, need work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(department, is needed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(department, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(department, need work together)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(department, need work together)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(department, need work together)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(education, is needed)