deposition: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.68
, statement
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings testimony
Weight: 0.63
, affidavit
Weight: 0.35
, filing
Weight: 0.34
, subpoena
Weight: 0.34
, transcript
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
is important process 0.89
is physical 0.82
be part of erosion process 0.81
is dominant process 0.79
has physical part tissue 0.78
is physical change 0.78
is physical changes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(deposition, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deposition, is important process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be part of erosion process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(deposition, is dominant process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(deposition, is physical change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(deposition, is physical changes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(deposition, is physical changes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(deposition, is physical changes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(deposition, is physical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(deposition, is physical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(deposition, is dominant process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(deposition, be part of erosion process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(deposition, is physical changes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(deposition, is physical change)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(deposition, be part of erosion process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(deposition, is dominant process)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(deposition, be part of erosion process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(deposition, is dominant process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(deposition, is important process)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(deposition, is important process)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(deposition, is important process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deposition, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(deposition, has physical part process)