depression: be in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personality disorder
Weight: 0.73
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.70
, syndrome
Weight: 0.69
, sickness
Weight: 0.68
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bulimia
Weight: 0.47
, bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.40
, psychosis
Weight: 0.39
, mental illness
Weight: 0.38
, schizophrenia
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada 1.00
is uk 0.84
increase in australia 0.81
be bad xanax 0.78
is xanax 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(eating disorder, be bad xanax)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(depression, be in canada)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(personality disorder, is xanax)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(depression, be in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(personality disorder, is xanax)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be bad xanax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be bad xanax)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(personality disorder, is xanax)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(psychosis, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(eating disorder, be bad xanax)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(depression, be in canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(personality disorder, is xanax)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(depression, be in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(psychosis, is uk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(psychosis, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(depression, be in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(depression, increase in australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(depression, increase in australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(depression, increase in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(depression, increase in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(depression, be in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(personality disorder, is xanax)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be bad xanax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(psychosis, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(personality disorder, is xanax)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(depression, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be bad xanax)