depth: be affected by length

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be affected by length 1.00
be affected by focal length 0.87
be with focal length 0.79
has magnitude width 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(depth, be affected by length)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(depth, has magnitude width)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(depth, be with focal length)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(depth, be affected by focal length)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(depth, has magnitude width)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(depth, be with focal length)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(depth, be with focal length)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(depth, be affected by focal length)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(depth, be with focal length)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(depth, be affected by focal length)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(depth, has magnitude width)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(depth, has magnitude width)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(depth, be affected by focal length)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(depth, be affected by length)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(depth, be affected by length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(depth, be affected by length)