depth: be important in aquatic ecosystems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in aquatic ecosystems 1.00
be important in ecosystems 0.94
affect oceans 0.79
affect ocean life 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(depth, be important in ecosystems)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, be important in ecosystems)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in ecosystems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(depth, affect ocean life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(depth, affect oceans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(depth, affect ocean life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in ecosystems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(depth, affect ocean life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(depth, affect oceans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(depth, affect oceans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect ocean life)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect oceans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(depth, be important in aquatic ecosystems)