depth: is overrated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is overrated 1.00
is underrated 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(depth, is overrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talent, is underrated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(depth, is overrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(talent, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(talent, is underrated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(depth, is overrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(depth, is overrated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(depth, is overrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(depth, is overrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(depth, is overrated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(depth, is overrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(depth, is overrated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(depth, is overrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(talent, is underrated)