design software: be used to software development

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to software development 1.00
causes make good software 0.83
causes design software bug 0.83
requires be software engineer 0.82
causes have meet with other software designer 0.77
causes use iterative design model 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(design software, be used to software development)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(design software, causes design software bug)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(design software, causes design software bug)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(design software, causes make good software)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(design software, requires be software engineer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(design software, causes make good software)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(design software, requires be software engineer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(design software, causes have meet with other software designer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(design software, requires be software engineer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(design software, causes have meet with other software designer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(design software, causes make good software)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes design software bug)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires be software engineer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes have meet with other software designer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes make good software)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(design software, causes have meet with other software designer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(design software, causes design software bug)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(design software, be used to software development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(design software, be used to software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(design software, be used to software development)