design: affect teenagers choice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect teenagers choice 1.00
give choice 0.77
affects education of child 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, affects education of child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(design, affect teenagers choice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cost, affects education of child)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cost, affects education of child)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(architect, give choice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, affects education of child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(design, affect teenagers choice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(architect, give choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(architect, give choice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(design, affect teenagers choice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(design, affect teenagers choice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(design, affect teenagers choice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cost, affects education of child)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(architect, give choice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(design, affect teenagers choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cost, affects education of child)