design: be at rug

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, ribbon
Weight: 0.59
, fin
Weight: 0.59
, pattern
Weight: 0.59
, animation
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rug 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(design, be at rug) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be at rug)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(design, be at rug) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(pattern, be at rug) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pattern, be at rug)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(design, be at rug) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(design, be at rug)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(design, be at rug) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(design, be at rug) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(design, be at rug)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(design, be at rug) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(design, be at rug)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(design, be at rug) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pattern, be at rug)