design: be rated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated 1.00
be rated mature 0.89
is 2 rated m 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(prototype, is 2 rated m)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prototype, be rated mature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(prototype, is 2 rated m) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(prototype, is 2 rated m)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prototype, be rated mature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(prototype, be rated mature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(design, be rated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(design, be rated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(design, be rated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(prototype, is 2 rated m)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(design, be rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(prototype, be rated mature)