design: has state home

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state home 1.00
has state land 0.78
has state job 0.76
has state gas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(logo, has state land)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(architect, has state job)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chevron, has state gas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chevron, has state gas)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(chevron, has state gas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(architect, has state job)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(architect, has state job)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(logo, has state land)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(logo, has state land)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(design, has state home)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(design, has state home)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(design, has state home)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(logo, has state land)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(architect, has state job)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(design, has state home)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chevron, has state gas)