dessert: be created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be created 1.00
was created 0.96
be formed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fruit salad, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dessert, be created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fruit salad, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(dessert, be created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(dessert, be created)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, be formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be formed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dessert, be formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(dessert, be formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dessert, be created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fruit salad, was created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(dessert, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fruit salad, was created)