dessert: be in restaurants

Related concepts

Parents	fruit salad Weight: 0.75 , recipe Weight: 0.64 , sandwich Weight: 0.63 , entree Weight: 0.61
Siblings	tiramisu Weight: 0.84 , chocolate cake Weight: 0.79 , flan Weight: 0.79 , custard Weight: 0.76 , apple pie Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in restaurants	1.00
is restaurant	0.88
be in restaurants freaking	0.85
be formatted in restaurants	0.80
be important in cuisine	0.79
be used in kitchens	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(recipe, be formatted in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(dessert, be in restaurants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(recipe, be formatted in restaurants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(recipe, be formatted in restaurants)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(recipe, be formatted in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(dessert, be in restaurants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(tiramisu, is restaurant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(dessert, be in restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants freaking)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(dessert, be in restaurants freaking)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(dessert, be in restaurants freaking)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(dessert, be important in cuisine)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(dessert, be in restaurants freaking)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(dessert, be important in cuisine)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(dessert, be important in cuisine)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(dessert, be important in cuisine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(dessert, be in restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(recipe, be formatted in restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(tiramisu, is restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(dessert, be in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(recipe, be formatted in restaurants)