dessert: is diner

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
is diner 1.00
is restaurant 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(dessert, is diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(tiramisu, is restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(dessert, is diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(dessert, is diner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(dessert, is diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dessert, is diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is diner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(dessert, is diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dessert, is diner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is restaurant)