dessert: is once day

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
is once day 1.00
is once week 0.94
is day 0.87
is next day 0.83
is better next day 0.80
is better day 0.80
is week 0.79
was important in times 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, was important in times)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dessert, is once day)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, was important in times)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, was important in times)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is day)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is better day)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is next day)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is better next day)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, was important in times)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(dessert, is once day)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tiramisu, is day)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is day)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tiramisu, is next day)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is next day)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(tiramisu, is better next day)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is better next day)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tiramisu, is better day)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is better day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(dessert, is once day)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dessert, is once week)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dessert, is day)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(dessert, is day)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dessert, is once week)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once week)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(dessert, is day)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(dessert, is once week)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dessert, is week)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is day)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dessert, is week)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dessert, is week)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is week)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dessert, is once day)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sandwich, was important in times)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is day)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is next day)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is better next day)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is better day)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(dessert, is once day)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sandwich, was important in times)