detective: use science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents investigator
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.61
, officer
Weight: 0.61
, specialist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings narrator
Weight: 0.52
, police officer
Weight: 0.38
, lieutenant
Weight: 0.35
, warrant officer
Weight: 0.35
, constable
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use science 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(detective, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(police officer, use science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(detective, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(police officer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(police officer, use science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(detective, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(detective, use science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(detective, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(detective, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(detective, use science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(detective, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(detective, use science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(detective, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(police officer, use science)