detergent: be better than soaps in hard water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.65
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, disinfectant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.60
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.59
, bleach
Weight: 0.37
, liquid water
Weight: 0.36
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than soaps in hard water 1.00
be better than soaps in water 0.98
be more effective than soaps in hard water 0.97
be better than soaps 0.96
be more effective than soaps in water 0.94
be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water 0.94
be better than soaps in cleaning 0.93
be better than soaps for laundry 0.93
be more effective than soaps 0.92
be different from soaps 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(detergent, be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in cleaning)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(detergent, be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detergent, be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in cleaning)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in cleaning)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in cleaning)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be different from soaps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)