detergent: be less toxic than conventional detergents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.65
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, disinfectant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.60
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.59
, bleach
Weight: 0.37
, liquid water
Weight: 0.36
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less toxic than conventional detergents 1.00
be less toxic than detergents 0.97
be more effective than soaps for cleaning in water 0.84
be more effective than soaps for cleaning 0.83
be more effective than soaps in water 0.83
be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water 0.83
be more effective than soaps 0.82
be more effective than soaps in hard water 0.82
be better than soaps in cleaning 0.81
be better than soaps in water 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(detergent, be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detergent, be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in cleaning)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(detergent, be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in cleaning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be more effective than soaps for cleaning in hard water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in cleaning)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in cleaning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(detergent, be less toxic than conventional detergents)