detroit: was ideal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents michigan
Weight: 0.65
, new york
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.59
, team
Weight: 0.59
, name
Weight: 0.58
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, cleveland
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, boston
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was ideal 1.00
was ideal factory 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detroit, was ideal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(detroit, was ideal)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(detroit, was ideal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(detroit, was ideal factory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(detroit, was ideal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(detroit, was ideal factory)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(detroit, was ideal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detroit, was ideal factory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detroit, was ideal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(detroit, was ideal factory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(detroit, was ideal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detroit, was ideal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(detroit, was ideal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detroit, was ideal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detroit, was ideal)