developer: use science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents third party
Weight: 0.59
, programmer
Weight: 0.57
, business people
Weight: 0.57
, party
Weight: 0.56
, expert
Weight: 0.56
Siblings builder
Weight: 0.33
, realtor
Weight: 0.32
, publisher
Weight: 0.32
, engineer
Weight: 0.32
, operator
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
use science 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(developer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(developer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(engineer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(engineer, use science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(developer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(developer, use science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(developer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(developer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(developer, use science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(developer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(developer, use science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(developer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(engineer, use science)