development: affect capacity in given area for species other than humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect capacity in given area for species other than humans 1.00
be important for humans 0.84
be important to humans 0.81
be important for living organisms 0.81
be important for animals 0.80
be important as related to size of cells 0.80
be important for organisms 0.79
be to humans 0.79
be necessary in organisms 0.79
occur in organisms 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(process, be to humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(process, be to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(process, be to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for living organisms)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for organisms)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for humans)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important to humans)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(process, be to humans)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(cell division, be necessary in organisms)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cell division, be necessary in organisms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cell division, be important as related to size of cells)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important as related to size of cells)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cell division, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important to humans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell division, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for humans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cell division, be important for organisms)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for organisms)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(process, be to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cell division, be necessary in organisms)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cell division, be important as related to size of cells)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cell division, be important to humans)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for animals)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for organisms)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(process, be to humans)