development: affect communication abilities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect communication abilities 1.00
be in communication 0.83
have limited capabilities 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(process, be in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(development, affect communication abilities)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(process, be in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, be in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, have limited capabilities)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(process, be in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(development, affect communication abilities)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, have limited capabilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, have limited capabilities)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(development, affect communication abilities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, affect communication abilities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(development, affect communication abilities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(process, be in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, have limited capabilities)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(development, affect communication abilities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(process, be in communication)