development: be in children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in children 1.00
be important for child 0.85
be in adult animals 0.80
be useful in adults 0.77
be important in childhood 0.75
be important during childhood years 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in adult animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be useful in adults)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cell division, be in adult animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cell division, be in adult animals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cell division, be useful in adults) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cell division, be useful in adults)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(development, be in children)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(development, be important for child)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important for child)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for child)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(development, be important for child)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(development, be in children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(development, be in children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cell division, be in adult animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(development, be in children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cell division, be useful in adults)