development: compare with rome

Related concepts

Parents	concept Weight: 0.63 , aspect Weight: 0.60 , step Weight: 0.60 , process Weight: 0.60
Siblings	acquisition Weight: 0.69 , artificial intelligence Weight: 0.64 , discovery Weight: 0.62 , well Weight: 0.60 , cell division Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property	Similarity
compare with rome	1.00
compare with ones	0.80
compare with ones in china	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(development, compare with rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(development, compare with rome)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(development, compare with rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(development, compare with ones in china)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(development, compare with rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(development, compare with ones in china)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(development, compare with rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(development, compare with ones in china)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(development, compare with rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(development, compare with ones in china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(development, compare with rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(development, compare with rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(development, compare with rome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(development, compare with rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(development, compare with rome)