development: have necessary theories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
have necessary theories 1.00
have theories 0.96
be in scientific methods 0.78
be linked to cell theory 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(step, be in scientific methods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(development, have necessary theories)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific methods)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific methods)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be linked to cell theory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(step, be in scientific methods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(development, have necessary theories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cell division, be linked to cell theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cell division, be linked to cell theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(development, have necessary theories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(development, have necessary theories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(development, have necessary theories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific methods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell division, be linked to cell theory)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(development, have necessary theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific methods)