development: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
is hard 0.82
be important in counselling 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(step, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(development, is difficult)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(aspect, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(development, is difficult)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(development, is difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(aspect, is difficult)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(step, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aspect, is difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(step, is hard)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(aspect, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(development, is difficult)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(step, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(development, is difficult)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(development, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, is difficult)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(development, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(development, be important in counselling)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(development, be important in counselling)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(development, be important in counselling)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in counselling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(development, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aspect, is difficult)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(step, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is difficult)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aspect, is difficult)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(development, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(step, is hard)