device: be charged flying

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, network device
Weight: 0.78
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.77
, cartridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.78
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.75
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.75
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.74
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be charged flying 1.00
be charged fly 0.93
be charged 0.87
be fully charged on planes 0.82
be charged via connection 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electronic device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(device, be charged flying)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electronic device, be fully charged on planes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(device, be charged flying)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electronic device, be charged flying)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(electronic device, be fully charged on planes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be charged flying)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be fully charged on planes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electronic device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(device, be charged flying)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electronic device, be fully charged on planes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(device, be charged flying)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(device, be charged flying)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(device, be charged fly)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(device, be charged fly)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(device, be charged fly)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(device, be charged fly)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(device, be fully charged on planes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(device, be fully charged on planes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, be fully charged on planes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(device, be fully charged on planes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(device, be charged flying)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(device, be charged flying)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electronic device, be charged flying)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(electronic device, be fully charged on planes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electronic device, be charged flying)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(device, be charged flying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(electronic device, be fully charged on planes)