device: be powered up on motherboard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, network device
Weight: 0.78
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.77
, cartridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.78
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.75
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.75
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.74
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be powered up on motherboard 1.00
appear as one on router 0.76
be more expensive than desktop computers with power 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(device, be powered up on motherboard)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(device, appear as one on router)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(device, appear as one on router)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(device, appear as one on router)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(device, appear as one on router)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(device, be powered up on motherboard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, be powered up on motherboard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(device, be powered up on motherboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)