device: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, network device
Weight: 0.78
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.77
, cartridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.78
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.75
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.75
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.74
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state case 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cartridge, has state case)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cartridge, has state case)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, has state case)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cartridge, has state case)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(device, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(device, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(device, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cartridge, has state case)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cartridge, has state case)