device: is zero

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, network device
Weight: 0.78
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.77
, cartridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.78
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.75
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.75
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.74
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zero 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(device, is zero)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(network device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(device, is zero)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(network device, is zero)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is zero)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(network device, is zero)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is zero)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, is zero)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(network device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, is zero)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(device, is zero)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(device, is zero)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(device, is zero)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(network device, is zero)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(electronic device, is zero)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(network device, is zero)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(device, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(electronic device, is zero)