dialogue: be important in play

Related concepts

Parents	strategy Weight: 0.62 , work Weight: 0.60 , exchange Weight: 0.60 , conversation Weight: 0.59
Siblings	discussion Weight: 0.66 , republic Weight: 0.59 , parmenides Weight: 0.48 , framework Weight: 0.33 , partnership Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in play	1.00
be important in counselling	0.87
be in competitive play	0.85
be important to tobago	0.85
be important specialisation take	0.84
play fun	0.82
different for game	0.81
be important in life	0.80
be important for people	0.79
is vital right	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(exchange, be important to tobago) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in play)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(conversation, be important in life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in play)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(work, be important for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in play)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(work, be important in life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in play)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(exchange, be important specialisation take) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in play)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(exchange, be important specialisation take)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(exchange, be important to tobago)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(work, be important in life)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(conversation, be important in life)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(work, be important for people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in life)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important to tobago)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important specialisation take)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(work, be important for people)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(work, be important in life)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(exchange, be important to tobago) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in play)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(conversation, be important in life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in play)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(work, be important for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in play)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(work, be important in life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in play)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(exchange, be important specialisation take) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in play)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(framework, be important in counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in play)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in life)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in life)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in life)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(exchange, be important specialisation take)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(work, be important in life)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(work, be important for people)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(exchange, be important to tobago)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(conversation, be important in life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(framework, be important in counselling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(exchange, be important specialisation take)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(exchange, be important to tobago)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(work, be important in life)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(conversation, be important in life)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(dialogue, be important in play) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(work, be important for people)