dialysis: be hard on heart

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.70
, condition
Weight: 0.62
, renal failure
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.55
Siblings hospital care
Weight: 0.37
, blood transfusion
Weight: 0.36
, transplant
Weight: 0.36
, chemotherapy
Weight: 0.36
, surgery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard on heart 1.00
is hard 0.83
be hard on body 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be hard on body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(surgery, be hard on body)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(surgery, be hard on body)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(surgery, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(surgery, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dialysis, be hard on heart)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be hard on body)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(dialysis, be hard on body)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dialysis, be hard on body)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dialysis, be hard on body)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be hard on heart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dialysis, be hard on heart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(surgery, be hard on body)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(surgery, is hard)